Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 1:59:45 — 34.2MB) | Embed

Subscribe: Email | RSS

BTWRLM175

Behind The Woodshed 3rd year Anniversary at Real Liberty Media

At the Situationally Aware Action Oriented Intelligence Center
Of Evolutionary Engagement

The Victory Against You in the Silent War is Your Silence

More Better Action

Protect Your Granted Rights

• Sign The Petition – Please
  
  From the Jefferson Mining District front page, Click on the petition link. Thank you very much for defending your property and that of future generations, no the real ones, and additionally, for helping Jefferson Mining District help you.

Toxic Water – Toxic You

• Unsafe levels of toxic chemicals found in drinking water for six million Americans
  

  Levels of a widely used class of industrial chemicals linked with cancer and other health problems — polyfluoroalkyl and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) — exceed federally recommended safety levels in public drinking water supplies for six million people in the U.S., according to a new study led by researchers from Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS).

  The study will be published August 9, 2016 in Environmental Science & Technology Letters.

  “For many years, chemicals with unknown toxicities, such as PFASs, were allowed to be used and released to the environment, and we now have to face the severe consequences,” said lead author Xindi Hu, a doctoral student in the Department of Environmental Health at Harvard Chan School and Environmental Science and Engineering at SEAS. “In addition, the actual number of people exposed may be even higher than our study found, because government data for levels of these compounds in drinking water is lacking for almost a third of the U.S. population — about 100 million people.”

  PFASs have been used over the past 60 years in industrial and commercial products ranging from food wrappers to clothing to pots and pans. They have been linked with cancer, hormone disruption, high cholesterol, and obesity. Although several major manufacturers have discontinued the use of some PFASs, the chemicals continue to persist in people and wildlife. Drinking water is one of the main routes through which people can be exposed.

   

Zika Fraud Spraying Autism

• Bombshell: Zika fraud leads to mosquito spraying and autism
  

  The title of this piece could have been, “When the cure for a problem causes the problem.”

  Naled, the organophosphate pesticide now being sprayed on Miami to kill “Zika mosquitoes,” has dire effects.

  Reference: a 2014 study, “Neurodevelopmental disorders and prenatal residential proximity to agricultural pesticides: the CHARGE study.” [Environmental Health Perspectives, 2014 Oct;122(10):1103-9.]

  Key quotes from the study:

  “Gestational exposure to several common agricultural pesticides can induce developmental neurotoxicity in humans, and has been associated with developmental delay and autism.” [Emphasis added]

  “We evaluated whether residential proximity to agricultural pesticides during pregnancy is associated with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) or developmental delay (DD)…”

  “Approximately one-third of CHARGE study mothers lived, during pregnancy, within 1.5 km (just under 1 mile) of an agricultural pesticide application. Proximity to organophosphates at some point during gestation was associated with a 60% increased risk for ASD [Autism Spectrum Disorders], higher for third-trimester exposures…and second-trimester chlorpyrifos [an organophosphate pesticide] applications…”

  “This study of ASD strengthens the evidence linking neurodevelopmental disorders with gestational pesticide exposures, particularly organophosphates…”

  The pesticide spraying affects pregnant mothers by raising the risk of neurological damage to their babies.

• What you’ll never read about virus-research fraud
  

  There are very few investigators on the planet who are interested in this subject. I am one of them. There is a reason why.

  In many articles, I’ve written about the shocking lack of logic in the curriculum of advanced centers of learning. When I attended college, I was fortunate to have a professor who taught logic, and taught it in a way that appealed to the minds of his students. In other words, for those of us who cared, we could not only absorb the subject matter, we could think with it; for example, we could approach an area of knowledge and track it back to its most basic premises. And then we could check those premises and see whether they were true and correct. If they were incorrect, we could then challenge many accepted notions that followed from those basic untruths.

  That is one of the payoffs of being able to deploy logic.

  With this introduction, let me bring up the issue of disease-causation. How do researchers decide that a given virus causes a given condition?

  There are many twists and turns involved in answering the question, but before being able to engage in such a discussion, a more basic factor has to be considered:

  Has the virus in question ever been isolated and identified? More simply, has it ever been found?

  Obviously, in order to eventually say virus A causes condition B, you have to know you’ve found, discovered, isolated virus A from some tissue sample removed from a human being.

  I’m not talking about tests run on people in 2016, to decide whether they have virus A. I’m talking about the first time, the first time ever a researcher said, “I’ve found a virus we’ve never seen before. I’m calling it virus A.”

  So, for example, with all the chatter about people with Ebola in recent years, the question would be: when was the first time a researcher said, “We’ve verified the existence of a virus we’ve never seen before, and we’re calling it Ebola.”

  When was that, and by what procedure was this discovery made?

  For many people, it’s unthinkable that scientists would say a given virus is causing many people to fall ill—and yet that virus had never really been isolated and identified—but who knows what you find out when you go down the rabbit hole?

  Let’s consider HIV, the purported cause of AIDS. Independent reporter Christine Johnson conducted a magnificent and shocking rabbit-hole interview with Dr. Eleni Papadopulos, “a biophysicist and leader of a group of HIV/AIDS scientists from Perth in Western Australia. Over the past decade and more she and her colleagues have published many scientific papers questioning the HIV/AIDS hypothesis…” The interview was titled: Does HIV Exist?

  I’ll highlight part of the exchange, because it’s so telling and instructive. Keep in mind that what Eleni Papadopulos is saying about HIV could apply to any virus — including zika.

  The interview takes up a few complex procedures, but if you read through it several times, you should be able to sort out the key points:

  Christine Johnson (CJ): Does HIV cause AIDS?

  Eleni Papadopulos (EP): There is no proof that HIV causes AIDS.

  CJ: Why not?

  EP: For many reasons, but most importantly, because there is no proof that HIV exists. [Read More, Read Why at the link above].

   

   

Dangers of The Well-Intentioned

• How To Say No To Vaccinations and Smart Meters
  

  The “Opt-Out” contract IS A SCAM! This video presents detailed info how to more effectively refuse and challenge harmful and illegal programs which attempt to force you to accept dangerous policies such as vaccinations and spying/transmitting utility meters. This video goes into detail to present your legal options and explain the powerful free documents at FreedomTaker.com which are designed to put the authority back in your hands.

   

   

Helping The Oppressed

• Ryan Bundy Afraid For His Life Update- August 2016
  

  LATEST FROM ANGIE HUNTINGTON BUNDY… Ryans Wife- 12 August 2016:Ok…here is the latest,Ryan had his “hearing” yesterday. This is a matter that is done in the jail, and an employee of the jail is the “judge”. She heard the side of the deputies, but interrupted Ryan, and would not listen to his side of the story. He maintains that the whole reason that he was taken out of his cell in the first place was fraudulent…there was no court, and he sat in the courthouse all day long. Of course, he was beaten soundly before hand. His wrist was dislocated, his thumb either broken or dislocated, he is having knee trouble, and he has head injuries. All of that aside…he never resisted, other than grab the railing on the staircase to prevent his fall. Anyhow, because of the court proceeding, Ryan was given a guilty verdict because of his “crimes” and will not be out of solitary or “segregation” as they like to call it until September 17…weeks after trial. In the mean time, trial is right around the corner. He can in no way prepare for his defense
  Bundy Family rep, Kelli Stewart, talks to Defending Utah about what is going on behind the scenes. Ryan fears for his life, that they might kill him any day now. Feds try and remove bullet to hide evidence and are hiding him from lawyers and family.

Out-flanking Fraud

• Marijuana to remain illegal under federal law, DEA says
  

  Marijuana advocates who hoped the cascade of states moving to legalize medical marijuana would soften the federal stance on the drug faced disappointment Thursday as the Drug Enforcement Administration announced it will keep marijuana illegal for any purpose.

  Marijuana will remain a Schedule 1 substance under the Controlled Substances Act. Substances in Schedule 1 are determined by the Food and Drug Administration to have no medical use. States that allow marijuana for medical use or legalize recreational use remain in defiance of federal law.

  The announcement to be published Friday in the Federal Register relaxes the rules for marijuana research to make it easier for institutions to grow marijuana for scientific study. The DEA currently authorizes just one grow facility in Mississippi.

  In reaching its conclusion, the DEA said a Health and Human Services evaluation shows marijuana has no ‘‘currently accepted medical use’’ because “the drug’s chemistry is not known and reproducible; there are no adequate safety studies; there are no adequate and well-controlled studies proving efficacy; the drug is not accepted by qualified experts; and the scientific evidence is not widely available.”

  “There is no evidence that there is a consensus among qualified experts that marijuana is safe and effective for use in treating a specific, recognized disorder,” the report added.

Lawful Marriage of Guns & Drug Money

• Factbox: Cannabis industry reacts to DEA decision on marijuana
  

  The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration on Thursday denied requests to stop classifying marijuana as a dangerous drug with no medical use, leaving users and businesses in limbo after many states have legalized it for medical or recreational purposes.

  But the DEA did relax certain restrictions on growing marijuana for research purposes.

  For decades, marijuana has been listed as a “Schedule I” drug, placing it on par with heroin and LSD.

  Following are responses from cannabis industry executives.

  STU TITUS, CEO of MEDICAL MARIJUANA INC (MJNA.PK), a California maker of hemp oil

  “It’s unfortunate that we’re not going to be able to further legitimize the industry, as I’m sure this will have a negative impact on the ability of these businesses to bank on cannabis industry cash.”

   

• Obama’s Operation Choke Point: “Unbridled Abuse Of Executive Power Operating Completely Outside Of The Rule Of Law”
  

  In an earlier article I touched on the withering attack on the 2^nd Amendment that has subsided to a “dull throb” for the moment.  A large portion of that is “Operation Choke Point,” the regulatory “assault” instituted by the Federal Government to force the banking industry to deny services to industries, not on the basis of illegality, but incorrectness as judged by the administration.

  This cabal is represented by the Office of the Comptroller of Currency, the Federal Reserve, and the FDIC under the “ringmaster” of the Department of Justice.  The aforementioned agencies have regulated the banking industry by using their positions as directed by the administration to sever businesses from their connections with the banks.  Specifically, the firearms industry, to include (in order) first firearms manufacturers, and the complementary industries that are synergistic with those manufacturers, namely ammunition manufacturers and accessory products for firearms.

  The regulators mentioned have used their authority to browbeat the banks into submission and deny businesses in the firearms industry such things as lines of credit, as well as forcing the closure of business and purchasing accounts.  Any banks that refused to institute any of these measures against their clients then opened themselves up to inspections, scrutiny, examinations, and harassment from a regulatory perspective.  The “cover” phrase for the regulatory agencies: “To promote bank safety and soundness.”

  “Reputation risk” is the term used by the regulating industries, in essence, to blackball the banks by stating their clients (in this case businesses involved in the firearms industry) were increasing risk for the banks and that the banks themselves were absorbing “negative publicity.”  The regulators insisted they had an obligation to “protect” the banking industry overall by eliminating the potential for the absorption of bad publicity by one of its members due to negativity associated with that third party.  In essence, guilt by association, and in this case guilt not by a court of law as a verdict for a crime, but a bureaucratic regulator operating at the behest of the Obama administration, making its own restrictive “laws” to inhibit legal businesses.

  These procedures completely subvert rule of law.  The reputation risk concept enables these regulators to force financial institutions to close any account and cease business with any business they deem to be either “improper” or “unsavory.”  This is a method to deny the businesses the financial support structure they are dependent upon to conduct their affairs and eventually to force the businesses to close.  If the bank refuses to turn on the client, then the bureaucracies will attack the bank and punish it.

  Some of the largest targeted sectors are pawn shops, tobacco outlets, gun dealers, and check-cashing services.  There are reasons these businesses are listed as “unsavory.”  The pawn shops do not allow for complete accountability on what is sold and what is purchased for the government to track.  Tobacco outlets are along lines of the recent “politically correct” attacks on smokers and the attempt to stamp out smoking in general.  Check cashing services usually enable people to cash their paychecks at a usurious rate regarding the fee; however, it allows for the circulation of cash in the hands of those who do not possess a bank account.  Gun dealers: the reason is self-explanatory.

  All of this is about control and dominion, the erosion of personal freedoms, and the move toward totalitarian suppression of all liberties and complete monitoring over any and all activities of the average citizen.

Bush’s Yapdog Co-conspirator Confirmed

• Leaked Memo Reveals Blair’s ‘Deal In Blood’ With Bush Over Iraq War
  

  Leaked White House memo shows former Prime Minister’s support for war at summit with U.S. President in 2002
  Bombshell document shows Blair preparing to act as spin doctor for Bush, who was told ‘the UK will follow our lead’
  Publicly, Blair still claimed to be looking for diplomatic solution – in direct contrast to email revelations
  New light was shed on Bush-Blair relations by material disclosed by Hillary Clinton at the order of the U.S. courts
  By William Lowther In Washington and Glen Owen for The Mail on Sunday
  October 17, 2015 “Information Clearing House” – “Daily Mail” – A bombshell White House memo has revealed for the first time details of the ‘deal in blood’ forged by Tony Blair and George Bush over the Iraq War.
  The sensational leak shows that Blair had given an unqualified pledge to sign up to the conflict a year before the invasion started.
  It flies in the face of the Prime Minister’s public claims at the time that he was seeking a diplomatic solution to the crisis.
  He told voters: ‘We’re not proposing military action’ – in direct contrast to what the secret email now reveals.

The Weekend War Report

Unleash the Power of the DOGE OF WAR
Please Donate to RLM

In This Doge Eat Doge World

Required Reading

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars

• The people know that they have created this farce and financed it with their own taxes (consent), but they would rather knuckle under than be the hypocrite. Factor VI – Cattle Those who will not use their brains are no better off than those who have no brains, and so this mindless school of jelly-fish, father, mother, son, and daughter, become useful beasts of burden or trainers of the same.
• Mr. Rothschild’s Energy Discovery
  What Mr. Rothschild [2] had discovered was the basic principle of power, influence, and control over people as applied to economics. That principle is “when you assume the appearance of power, people soon give it to you.”

The Law of War

• General Orders No. 100: The Lieber Code

  INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF ARMIES OF THE UNITED STATES IN THE FIELD

Where Not Throwing Oppression Off, You Live Either Under an Occupation or by Conquest.

The Choice and Responsibility are Yours. United We Strike

Behind The Woodshed for that practical education & hard but necessary dose of reality.

Spread The Word Behind The Woodshed.

(^_^)

4

Similar Posts:

• Behind The Woodshed Blogcaster – February 24, 2019.
• Behind The Woodshed Blogcaster – Aug 26, 2018.
• Behind The Woodshed Blogcaster – Aug 20, 2017.